Benedict Arnold
Benedict Arnold, Judas, backstabber, betrayer, Brutus, defector, deserter, double-crosser, yellow, fink, traitor, treasonist and turncoat - just to name a few. These are words and phrases used to describe individuals who refuse to fight – or rather those who refuse to go to war. These terms are used for people seen as unpatriotic or those swimming against the current of popular sentiment. Time and again throughout U.S. history, generations have been divided over the issue of war.
In “Dooley Is a Traitor”, author James Michie depicts a convicted criminal who is facing a judge during his trial for his refusal to go to war. The accused, Dooley, has no intention of hiding his true nature. He bluntly tells the judge that he would willingly kill several individuals he dislikes. ‘“Why, I’d as soon think of killing a worshipful judge, High-court, like yourself…”’ he says in the poem, clearly demonstrating that it’s not the act of killing Dooley opposes. Dooley struggles with his conscience when it comes to killing without a grudge – a joke to laugh at after. This defense is found to be curious by the court. Dooley does not buy the judge’s argument that this is a fight between good and evil. He even paraphrases a story from the Bible where God deals with evil in a much more civilized manner. Dooley argues that in war, both sides lose and he is merely choosing which losing side he will take. He does not buy the news propaganda being fed to the general public. After making a case for only being willing to kill for a reason, and telling the Judge that he does not expect a non-murderer to understand what it is he won’t do, Dooley is found guilty as a traitor and sentenced to death. Despite his faith, Dooley states he would rather die than fight.
This poem hints at a far deeper issue, the use of God’s name in the advance of human motives. Since time in memoriam, humans have invoked the Devine to manipulate their fellow man into a fear-filled blind obedience.
‘“We want a clearer reason why you refuse to carry a gun. This war is not a personal feud; it’s a fight against wrong ideas on behalf of the Right. Mr. Dooley, won’t you help destroy evil ideas?”’ This is the reasoning used by the judge to justify every able man having to join in the fight. This is a classic example of winning the public’s support for a cause by an attempt at invoking guilt in the individual. It is the conditioning of the individual to fight ideas – usually ideas he or she does not fully understand or care to ascertain. To this Dooley responds, ‘“I could not find it in my heart to be unkind to an idea.”’
The Judge finds it difficult to comprehend how a criminal can invoke conscience to his aid to support an individual withdrawal from a ‘“communal crusade sanctioned by God, led by the Church, against a godless, churchless nation.”’
Communal - as in belonging to the people. A crusade – a war carried on under papal sanction. And being sanctioned by God – gives the cause the much-needed authoritative permission and approval, making the action valid. And the icing on the cake… all this is “against a godless, churchless nation.” How can one abstain?
In response to further refusal to bend, the judge challenges Dooley with the question, ‘“What do you know of the Christian creed?”’ and Dooley respond, ‘“nothing, sir, except for what I can read…I find when the Lord himself misliked an evil notion He turned it into a pig and drove it squealing over a cliff into the ocean…A neat and Christian murder. None of your mad slaughter…We all lose, we’re all dammed sinners. I’d rather be with the poor cold people at the wall that’s shot than the bloody guilty devils in the firing-line, in Hell and keeping hot.”’ With this passage, Dooley points out to the judge that God – He who sanctioned this war – does not dispose of evil in such a brutal manner as they themselves are doing. He in-turn tells the judge that by invoking God’s name in their evil acts, the perpetrators have secured for themselves a place in hell.
This poem illustrates man’s shameless manipulation of the Holy in pushing his agenda. In the name of God, countless souls have perished. Even to this day, the American psyche is manipulated by phrases like “the Axis of Evil.” I find it hard to comprehend that a Creator would “pick” a few of his creatures to enforce His will over their fellow creatures. Man is quick to evoke the name of God in profane ways. We need to only evoke God’s name with the reverence due from the creature to his Creator.
In “Dooley Is a Traitor”, author James Michie depicts a convicted criminal who is facing a judge during his trial for his refusal to go to war. The accused, Dooley, has no intention of hiding his true nature. He bluntly tells the judge that he would willingly kill several individuals he dislikes. ‘“Why, I’d as soon think of killing a worshipful judge, High-court, like yourself…”’ he says in the poem, clearly demonstrating that it’s not the act of killing Dooley opposes. Dooley struggles with his conscience when it comes to killing without a grudge – a joke to laugh at after. This defense is found to be curious by the court. Dooley does not buy the judge’s argument that this is a fight between good and evil. He even paraphrases a story from the Bible where God deals with evil in a much more civilized manner. Dooley argues that in war, both sides lose and he is merely choosing which losing side he will take. He does not buy the news propaganda being fed to the general public. After making a case for only being willing to kill for a reason, and telling the Judge that he does not expect a non-murderer to understand what it is he won’t do, Dooley is found guilty as a traitor and sentenced to death. Despite his faith, Dooley states he would rather die than fight.
This poem hints at a far deeper issue, the use of God’s name in the advance of human motives. Since time in memoriam, humans have invoked the Devine to manipulate their fellow man into a fear-filled blind obedience.
‘“We want a clearer reason why you refuse to carry a gun. This war is not a personal feud; it’s a fight against wrong ideas on behalf of the Right. Mr. Dooley, won’t you help destroy evil ideas?”’ This is the reasoning used by the judge to justify every able man having to join in the fight. This is a classic example of winning the public’s support for a cause by an attempt at invoking guilt in the individual. It is the conditioning of the individual to fight ideas – usually ideas he or she does not fully understand or care to ascertain. To this Dooley responds, ‘“I could not find it in my heart to be unkind to an idea.”’
The Judge finds it difficult to comprehend how a criminal can invoke conscience to his aid to support an individual withdrawal from a ‘“communal crusade sanctioned by God, led by the Church, against a godless, churchless nation.”’
Communal - as in belonging to the people. A crusade – a war carried on under papal sanction. And being sanctioned by God – gives the cause the much-needed authoritative permission and approval, making the action valid. And the icing on the cake… all this is “against a godless, churchless nation.” How can one abstain?
In response to further refusal to bend, the judge challenges Dooley with the question, ‘“What do you know of the Christian creed?”’ and Dooley respond, ‘“nothing, sir, except for what I can read…I find when the Lord himself misliked an evil notion He turned it into a pig and drove it squealing over a cliff into the ocean…A neat and Christian murder. None of your mad slaughter…We all lose, we’re all dammed sinners. I’d rather be with the poor cold people at the wall that’s shot than the bloody guilty devils in the firing-line, in Hell and keeping hot.”’ With this passage, Dooley points out to the judge that God – He who sanctioned this war – does not dispose of evil in such a brutal manner as they themselves are doing. He in-turn tells the judge that by invoking God’s name in their evil acts, the perpetrators have secured for themselves a place in hell.
This poem illustrates man’s shameless manipulation of the Holy in pushing his agenda. In the name of God, countless souls have perished. Even to this day, the American psyche is manipulated by phrases like “the Axis of Evil.” I find it hard to comprehend that a Creator would “pick” a few of his creatures to enforce His will over their fellow creatures. Man is quick to evoke the name of God in profane ways. We need to only evoke God’s name with the reverence due from the creature to his Creator.
